Ethical considerations

Research on vaccines for pregnant and lactating women raises ethical issues that differ from those in therapeutic research. Vaccines are given to healthy individuals to prevent disease, therefore the acceptable level of risk is generally lower and requires careful assessment of potential benefits and harms. In early trials, women may not gain direct benefit themselves, making it essential to carefully weigh risks and benefits during pregnancy, when both mother and fetus are particularly vulnerable (see Figure 1).

Figure 1 – Practical application of ethical dimensions in vaccine trials  

Figure 1 - Practical application of ethical dimensions in vaccine trial

Risk benefit assessment framework for use of vaccines in pregnancy

Decisions about vaccine use in pregnancy often need to be made with limited data on safety or immune response in this group. These evidence gaps make it harder for regulators, policy-makers, and health workers to give clear guidance, and they complicate informed consent. Where sufficient non-clinical and human safety data exist, inclusion of pregnant women should be considered earlier in product development rather than deferred until post-licensure.

A structured risk–benefit framework (Table 1) may help guide these decisions by:

  • considering timing of vaccination, distribution of benefits, and potential public health impact; 
  • ensuring pregnant and lactating women, as well as women’s advocacy groups, are involved in its design so that it reflects their needs and concerns; 
  • emphasizing equity, transparency, and local context to build trust and support uptake. 

 

Table 1 Risk–benefit assessment framework for use of vaccines in pregnancy
ConsiderationBest practice – Research contextBest practice – implementation context
Likelihood of infection

• Map local epidemiology and exposure risks before site selection.

• Stratify recruitment by risk and collect exposure metrics.

• Use modelling to estimate event rates.

• Use surveillance to identify high-risk areas/times for campaigns.

• Prioritize maternal vaccination in epidemics or where vertical transmission risk is high.

• Align delivery with seasonality and antenatal care attendance.

Severity of harms

• Harmonize severity endpoints (Global Alignment of Immunization safety Assessment in pregnancy (GAIA) network, WHO minimum maternal and neonatal health data set (MNHDS)).

• Collect trimester-specific maternal, fetal, and neonatal data.

• Plan pooled analyses for rare severe outcomes.

• Use burden-of-disease data to prioritize vaccines.

• Consider trimester-specific recommendations.

• Strengthen obstetric/neonatal care in parallel with rollout.

• Communicate transparently about severity risks.

• Ensure linkage between maternal and child health records and co-ordination with the WHO Expanded Programme of Immunization for surveillance of adverse events following immunization during antenatal/postpartum care in pregnant and postpartum women and adverse events following immunization in the infant.

Vaccine Immune Protection

• Include maternal immunogenicity and placental transfer endpoints.

• Conduct trimester-stratified analyses.

• Identify correlates of protection and harmonize assays.

• Base policy on clinically meaningful infant protection.

• Time vaccination to optimize transplacental transfer.

• Build lab capacity for immune monitoring